Welcome to the IKCEST

Journal of electrocardiology | Vol.41, Issue.4 | | Pages 287-91

Journal of electrocardiology

Time domain parameters can be estimated with less statistical error than frequency domain parameters in the analysis of heart rate variability.

Oliver, Kuss Barbara, Schumann Alexander, Kluttig Karin Halina, Greiser Johannes, Haerting  
Abstract

Measures of heart rate variability (HRV) can be divided in time domain and frequency domain parameters. It is frequently ignored that estimation of frequency-domain parameters is a 2-step procedure where statistical error from the first step (spectral estimation) is neglected in subsequent analyses.We performed a simulation study to quantify the statistical error by using frequency domain instead of time domain parameters. We generated tachograms from a stationary AR(1) process for a wide range of parameters and compared the resulting estimation error (in terms of precision and variability) for the standard deviation of normal RR intervals (SDNN) and low frequency (LF), high frequency (HF), and LF/HF power.Estimation of frequency domain parameters is associated with (up to 10-fold) increased variability, as compared with the SDNN. Moreover, the SDNN has higher precision.Frequency domain parameters should be applied in HRV analysis only if important physiological reasons suggest their use. If used, frequency domain parameters should be interpreted with caution, taking into account the statistical weaknesses of spectral estimation.

Original Text (This is the original text for your reference.)

Time domain parameters can be estimated with less statistical error than frequency domain parameters in the analysis of heart rate variability.

Measures of heart rate variability (HRV) can be divided in time domain and frequency domain parameters. It is frequently ignored that estimation of frequency-domain parameters is a 2-step procedure where statistical error from the first step (spectral estimation) is neglected in subsequent analyses.We performed a simulation study to quantify the statistical error by using frequency domain instead of time domain parameters. We generated tachograms from a stationary AR(1) process for a wide range of parameters and compared the resulting estimation error (in terms of precision and variability) for the standard deviation of normal RR intervals (SDNN) and low frequency (LF), high frequency (HF), and LF/HF power.Estimation of frequency domain parameters is associated with (up to 10-fold) increased variability, as compared with the SDNN. Moreover, the SDNN has higher precision.Frequency domain parameters should be applied in HRV analysis only if important physiological reasons suggest their use. If used, frequency domain parameters should be interpreted with caution, taking into account the statistical weaknesses of spectral estimation.

+More

Cite this article
APA

APA

MLA

Chicago

Oliver, Kuss Barbara, Schumann Alexander, Kluttig Karin Halina, Greiser Johannes, Haerting,.Time domain parameters can be estimated with less statistical error than frequency domain parameters in the analysis of heart rate variability.. 41 (4),287-91.

Disclaimer: The translated content is provided by third-party translation service providers, and IKCEST shall not assume any responsibility for the accuracy and legality of the content.
Translate engine
Article's language
English
中文
Pусск
Français
Español
العربية
Português
Kikongo
Dutch
kiswahili
هَوُسَ
IsiZulu
Action
Recommended articles

Report

Select your report category*



Reason*



By pressing send, your feedback will be used to improve IKCEST. Your privacy will be protected.

Submit
Cancel