EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing | Vol.2018, Issue.1 | | Pages
Using BayesShrink, BiShrink, Weighted BayesShrink, and Weighted BiShrink in NSST and SWT for Despeckling SAR Images
Abstract Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images are inherently degraded by multiplicative speckle noise where thresholding-based methods in the transform domain are appropriate. Being sparse, the coefficients in the transformed domain play a key role in the performance of any thresholding methods. It has been shown that the coefficients of nonsubsampled shearlet transform (NSST) are sparser than those of stationary wavelet transform (SWT) for either clean or noisy images. Therefore, it is expected that thresholding-based methods in NSST outperform those in the SWT domain. In this paper, BayesShrink, BiShrink, weighted BayesShrink, and weighted BiShrink in NSST and SWT domains are compared in terms of subjective and objective image assessment. As BayesShrink try to find the optimum threshold for every subband, BiShrink uses coefficients, name “parent,” to clean up coefficients called “child,” and the weighted methods consider the coefficients’ noise efficiency, which implies that subbands in the transform domain may be affected by noise differently. Two models for considering the parent in the NSST domain are proposed. In addition, for both BayesShrink and BiShrink, considering the weighting factor (coefficients noise efficiency) would improve the performance of the corresponding methods as well. Experimental results show that the weighted-BiShrink despeckling approach in the NSST domain gives an outstanding performance when tested with both artificially speckled images and real SAR images.
Original Text (This is the original text for your reference.)
Using BayesShrink, BiShrink, Weighted BayesShrink, and Weighted BiShrink in NSST and SWT for Despeckling SAR Images
Abstract Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images are inherently degraded by multiplicative speckle noise where thresholding-based methods in the transform domain are appropriate. Being sparse, the coefficients in the transformed domain play a key role in the performance of any thresholding methods. It has been shown that the coefficients of nonsubsampled shearlet transform (NSST) are sparser than those of stationary wavelet transform (SWT) for either clean or noisy images. Therefore, it is expected that thresholding-based methods in NSST outperform those in the SWT domain. In this paper, BayesShrink, BiShrink, weighted BayesShrink, and weighted BiShrink in NSST and SWT domains are compared in terms of subjective and objective image assessment. As BayesShrink try to find the optimum threshold for every subband, BiShrink uses coefficients, name “parent,” to clean up coefficients called “child,” and the weighted methods consider the coefficients’ noise efficiency, which implies that subbands in the transform domain may be affected by noise differently. Two models for considering the parent in the NSST domain are proposed. In addition, for both BayesShrink and BiShrink, considering the weighting factor (coefficients noise efficiency) would improve the performance of the corresponding methods as well. Experimental results show that the weighted-BiShrink despeckling approach in the NSST domain gives an outstanding performance when tested with both artificially speckled images and real SAR images.
+More
transformed domain weightedbishrink despeckling approach subbands weighting thresholdingbased methods thresholding weighted bayesshrink and weighted bishrink multiplicative speckle noise parent nsst and swt domains nonsubsampled shearlet transform nsst noisy images therefore artificially speckled images and real sar images stationary wavelet transform swt subjective and objective image assessment child clean
APA
MLA
Chicago
Nikou Farhangi,Sedigheh Ghofrani,.Using BayesShrink, BiShrink, Weighted BayesShrink, and Weighted BiShrink in NSST and SWT for Despeckling SAR Images. 2018 (1),.
Select your report category*
Reason*
New sign-in location:
Last sign-in location:
Last sign-in date: