Researchers know very little about extit{how} people choose mates. To remedy this, the present study examined the influence of number of potential mates and mate-standard strength on single women's choice satisfaction and strategy use. Single women chose one potential partner from a set of 4, 24, or 64 options presented on a real dating website. Participants adjusted to an increasing number of options by changing their decision-making strategies, such that they relied on noncompensatory, attribute-based strategies as the number of options increased. Across conditions they reported similar levels of satisfaction with the choice process and the person selected. Mate-standard strength qualified some of the results, however, as women with higher mate standards preferred extensive choice, and they tended to prefer compensatory choice strategies and were more satisfied with the option selected when he was selected from among many.

+More

single womens choice compensatory choice strategies noncompensatory attributebased strategies

Alison P. Lenton,Amanda Stewart,.Changing her ways. 3 (7),.

Alison P. Lenton,Amanda Stewart,"Changing her ways" 3

Alison P. Lenton,Amanda Stewart,"Changing her ways"