Journal of Art Historiography | Vol.4, Issue. | 2017-05-23 | Pages
Aboriginal Art: Who was interested?
This paper addresses the common assumption that Aboriginal art has been absent from Australian art histories and demonstrates how this is not so. It criticises the notion that art history should be represented by specialised art-history books and argues for the important of art museum displays as texts. It also examines the ways in which Aboriginal art has been examined in literature devoted to Australian history and anthropology. It foregrounds the idea that arts history is not necessarily best represented by official art historical texts.
Original Text (This is the original text for your reference.)
Aboriginal Art: Who was interested?
This paper addresses the common assumption that Aboriginal art has been absent from Australian art histories and demonstrates how this is not so. It criticises the notion that art history should be represented by specialised art-history books and argues for the important of art museum displays as texts. It also examines the ways in which Aboriginal art has been examined in literature devoted to Australian history and anthropology. It foregrounds the idea that arts history is not necessarily best represented by official art historical texts.
+More
art museum displays specialised arthistory books australian art histories official art historical texts
Select your report category*
Reason*
New sign-in location:
Last sign-in location:
Last sign-in date: