Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials | Vol., Issue. | 2019-12-19 | Pages 1961-1971
Fracture toughness and crack resistance curves of acrylic bone cements
The fracture toughness KIc of 11 clinically used acrylic bone cements was studied in air at room temperature with single edge V‐notched beam specimens. By driving the crack step‐wise through the specimens, crack resistance curves (“R‐curves”) were recorded. One group of bone cements showed an increase of the fracture toughness with increasing crack length (including CMW1+G and several Palacos bone cements) whereas another group (including Simplex, SmartSet, Copal and some Palacos bone cements) did not exhibit an R‐curve behavior. The plateau values for KIc ranged from 0.93 MPa√m (Simplex P) to 1.98 MPa√m (Palacos R+G). The observation of the crack growth with an optical microscope revealed some mechanisms influencing the crack growth like the formation of microcracks in the extended damage zone of the crack tip, the attraction of the crack by inclusions or the shielding of the crack tip by bridges in the wake of the crack. Furthermore, bone cements could be distinguished by the pattern of the path the crack followed during propagation. The crack pattern of CMW1+G provides a possible explanation of the distinct R‐curve behavior of this cement.
Original Text (This is the original text for your reference.)
Fracture toughness and crack resistance curves of acrylic bone cements
The fracture toughness KIc of 11 clinically used acrylic bone cements was studied in air at room temperature with single edge V‐notched beam specimens. By driving the crack step‐wise through the specimens, crack resistance curves (“R‐curves”) were recorded. One group of bone cements showed an increase of the fracture toughness with increasing crack length (including CMW1+G and several Palacos bone cements) whereas another group (including Simplex, SmartSet, Copal and some Palacos bone cements) did not exhibit an R‐curve behavior. The plateau values for KIc ranged from 0.93 MPa√m (Simplex P) to 1.98 MPa√m (Palacos R+G). The observation of the crack growth with an optical microscope revealed some mechanisms influencing the crack growth like the formation of microcracks in the extended damage zone of the crack tip, the attraction of the crack by inclusions or the shielding of the crack tip by bridges in the wake of the crack. Furthermore, bone cements could be distinguished by the pattern of the path the crack followed during propagation. The crack pattern of CMW1+G provides a possible explanation of the distinct R‐curve behavior of this cement.
+More
specimens crack resistance curves single edge vnotched beam fracture toughness kic crack pattern of cmw1g crack growth damage microcracks optical microscope rcurve behavior
APA
MLA
Chicago
Raimund Jaeger,Tobias Ziegler,.Fracture toughness and crack resistance curves of acrylic bone cements. (),1961-1971.
Kendall, K., Clegg, W., & Gregory, R. (1991). Growth of tied cracks: A model for polymer crazing. Journal of Materials Science Letters, 10(11), 671– 674.
Vila, M., Ginebra, M. P., Gil, F. J., & Planell, J. A. (1999). Effect of porosity and environment on the mechanical behavior of acrylic bone cement modified with acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene particles: I. Fracture toughness. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 48(2), 121– 127.
FDA. (2018). Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) Bone Cement—Guidance for Industry and FDA. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ucm072795.htm
Topoleski, L. T., Ducheyne, P., & Cuckler, J. M. (1992). The fracture toughness of titanium‐fiber‐reinforced bone cement. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 26(12), 1599– 1617.
Nguyen, N., Maloney, W., & Dauskardt, R. (1997). Reliability of PMMA bone cement fixation: Fracture and fatigue crack‐growth behaviour. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 8(8), 473– 483.
Rimnac, C. M., Wright, T. M., & McGill, D. L. (1986). The effect of centrifugation on the fracture properties of acrylic bone cements. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 68(2), 281– 287.
Atkins, A. G., & Mai, Y.‐W. (1985, 1985). Elastic and plastic fracture: Metals, polymers, ceramics, composites, biological materials (p. 817). Chichester, England: Ellis Horwood.
Hoey, D., & Taylor, D. (2009). Quantitative analysis of the effect of porosity on the fatigue strength of bone cement. Acta Biomaterialia, 5(2), 719– 726.
Weber, S. C., & Bargar, W. L. (1983). A comparison of the mechanical properties of simplex, Zimmer, and Zimmer low viscosity bone cements. Biomaterials, Medical Devices, and Artificial Organs, 11(1), 3– 12.
Hasenwinkel, J. M., Lautenschlager, E. P., Wixson, R. L., & Gilbert, J. L. (2002). Effect of initiation chemistry on the fracture toughness, fatigue strength, and residual monomer content of a novel high‐viscosity, two‐solution acrylic bone cement. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 59(3), 411– 421.
Lewis, G. (1997). Properties of acrylic bone cement: State of the art review. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 38(2), 155– 182.
ISO‐16402:2008(E). (2008). Implants for surgery—Acrylic resin cements: Flexural fatigue testing of acrylic resin cements used in orthopaedics. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
Lewis, G., & Mladsi, S. (2000). Correlation between impact strength and fracture toughness of PMMA‐based bone cements. Biomaterials, 21(8), 775– 781.
Dunne, N. (2008). 11—Mechanical properties of bone cements. In S. Deb (Ed.), Orthopaedic Bone Cements (pp. 233– 264). Cambridge, England: Woodhead Publishing.
Wright, T., & Trent, P. (1979). Mechanical properties of aramid fibre‐reinforced acrylic bone cement. Journal of Materials Science, 14(2), 503– 505.
Lewis, G. (1994). Effect of methylene blue on the fracture toughness of acrylic bone cement. Biomaterials, 15(12), 1024– 1028.
Kühn, K.‐D. (2014). PMMA cements. Heidelberg: Springer.
Kühn, K.‐D. (2000). Bone cements. Berlin: Springer.
Lucksanasombool, P., Higgs, W. A., Ignat, M., Higgs, R. J., & Swain, M. V. (2003). Comparison of failure characteristics of a range of cancellous bone‐bone cement composites. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A, 64(1), 93– 104.
Freitag, T. A., & Cannon, S. L. (1976). Fracture characteristics of acrylic bone cements. I. Fracture toughness. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 10(5), 805– 828.
Sinnett‐Jones, P. E., Browne, M., Ludwig, W., Buffière, J. Y., & Sinclair, I. (2005). Microtomography assessment of failure in acrylic bone cement. Biomaterials, 26(33), 6460– 6466.
Atkins, A. G., & Mai, Y. W. (1988). Elastic and plastic fracture (pp. 130– 143). Chichester, England: Ellis Horwood.
Jasper, L. E., Deramond, H., Mathis, J. M., & Belkoff, S. M. (1999). The effect of monomer‐to‐powder ratio on the material properties of cranioplastic. Bone, 25(2 Suppl), 27S– 29S.
Munz, D., & Fett, T. (2013). Mechanisches Verhalten keramischer Werkstoffe: Versagensablauf, Werkstoffauswahl, Dimensionierung (Vol. 8). Berlin: Springer‐Verlag.
Wang, C., & Pilliar, R. (1989). Fracture toughness of acrylic bone cements. Journal of Materials Science, 24(10), 3725– 3738.
ASTM‐E399‐12. (2012). Standard test method for linear‐elastic plane‐strain fracture toughness KIc of metallic materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
Krause, W. R., & Hofmann, A. (1989). Antibiotic impregnated acrylic bone cements: A comparative study of the mechanical properties. Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers, 4(4), 345– 361.
De Wijn, J., Slooff, T., & Driessens, F. (1975). Characterization of bone cements. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 46(1), 38– 51.
ASTM‐E561‐19. (2019). Standard test method for Kr curve determination. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
Topoleski, L. D., Ducheyne, P., & Cuckler, J. M. (1993). Microstructural pathway of fracture in poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement. Biomaterials, 14(15), 1165– 1172.
Select your report category*
Reason*
New sign-in location:
Last sign-in location:
Last sign-in date: