Welcome to the IKCEST

IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting | Vol.64, Issue.2 | | Pages 422-431

IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting

Quality Assessment of an HDR Dual-Layer Backward-Compatible Codec Compared to Uncompromised SDR and HDR Solutions

á   eř   bekWalt HusakTouradj Ebrahimi   Anne-Flore PerrinMartin Ř  
Abstract

Broadcasting high dynamic range (HDR) video has been demonstrated as largely preferred when compared to standard dynamic range (SDR), mainly due to its capability of representing more details in dark and bright regions. Additionally, progress over the last decades on creation, compression, transmission and rendering of HDR content signals a forthcoming deployment of HDR broadcasting services. Lack of a widely supported recommendation regarding bandwidth allocation for HDR compressed streams or a unique compression approach, prevent faster deployment of such services. This paper investigates the performance of a dual-layer backward-compatible compression codec, when compared to state-of-the-art HDR compression strategies, in terms of perceived quality. The evaluated system is a dual-layer compression scheme enabling the transmission of a backward-compatible SDR stream along with an HDR stream, reconstructed from the residual-based enhancement layer and SDR mapping (i.e., prediction). Comparison is made to two compression strategies realizing uncompromised SDR or HDR through the use of single-layer systems multiplexed with metadata. Metadata contains information necessary to map HDR into SDR or SDR into HDR streams. Our conclusion provides guidance regarding the compression strategy to use as well as bandwidth allocation for HDR delivery, ensuring both SDR and HDR contents with perceptually acceptable quality.

Original Text (This is the original text for your reference.)

Quality Assessment of an HDR Dual-Layer Backward-Compatible Codec Compared to Uncompromised SDR and HDR Solutions

Broadcasting high dynamic range (HDR) video has been demonstrated as largely preferred when compared to standard dynamic range (SDR), mainly due to its capability of representing more details in dark and bright regions. Additionally, progress over the last decades on creation, compression, transmission and rendering of HDR content signals a forthcoming deployment of HDR broadcasting services. Lack of a widely supported recommendation regarding bandwidth allocation for HDR compressed streams or a unique compression approach, prevent faster deployment of such services. This paper investigates the performance of a dual-layer backward-compatible compression codec, when compared to state-of-the-art HDR compression strategies, in terms of perceived quality. The evaluated system is a dual-layer compression scheme enabling the transmission of a backward-compatible SDR stream along with an HDR stream, reconstructed from the residual-based enhancement layer and SDR mapping (i.e., prediction). Comparison is made to two compression strategies realizing uncompromised SDR or HDR through the use of single-layer systems multiplexed with metadata. Metadata contains information necessary to map HDR into SDR or SDR into HDR streams. Our conclusion provides guidance regarding the compression strategy to use as well as bandwidth allocation for HDR delivery, ensuring both SDR and HDR contents with perceptually acceptable quality.

+More

Cite this article
APA

APA

MLA

Chicago

á,eř,bekWalt HusakTouradj Ebrahimi,Anne-Flore PerrinMartin Ř,.Quality Assessment of an HDR Dual-Layer Backward-Compatible Codec Compared to Uncompromised SDR and HDR Solutions. 64 (2),422-431.

Disclaimer: The translated content is provided by third-party translation service providers, and IKCEST shall not assume any responsibility for the accuracy and legality of the content.
Translate engine
Article's language
English
中文
Pусск
Français
Español
العربية
Português
Kikongo
Dutch
kiswahili
هَوُسَ
IsiZulu
Action
Recommended articles

Report

Select your report category*



Reason*



By pressing send, your feedback will be used to improve IKCEST. Your privacy will be protected.

Submit
Cancel