Welcome to the IKCEST

BMJ Global Health | Vol.5, Issue.10 | 2020-10-01 | Pages

BMJ Global Health

The value proposition of the Global Health Security Index.

Ravi, Sanjana J   Bapat, Priya   Nikkari, Simo   Cameron, Elizabeth   Meyer, Diane   James, Wilmot   George, Dylan   Paterra, Michael   Bell, Jessica   Makumbi, Issa   Gozzer, Ernesto   Warmbrod, Kelsey Lane   Mullen, Lucia   Machalaba, Catherine   Nath, Indira   Tomori, Oyewale   Nuzzo, Jennifer B   Gostin, Lawrence O  
Abstract

Infectious disease outbreaks pose major threats to human health and security. Countries with robust capacities for preventing, detecting and responding to outbreaks can avert many of the social, political, economic and health system costs of such crises. The Global Health Security Index (GHS Index)-the first comprehensive assessment and benchmarking of health security and related capabilities across 195 countries-recently found that no country is sufficiently prepared for epidemics or pandemics. The GHS Index can help health security stakeholders identify areas of weakness, as well as opportunities to collaborate across sectors, collectively strengthen health systems and achieve shared public health goals. Some scholars have recently offered constructive critiques of the GHS Index's approach to scoring and ranking countries; its weighting of select indicators; its emphasis on transparency; its focus on biosecurity and biosafety capacities; and divergence between select country scores and corresponding COVID-19-associated caseloads, morbidity, and mortality. Here, we (1) describe the practical value of the GHS Index; (2) present potential use cases to help policymakers and practitioners maximise the utility of the tool; (3) discuss the importance of scoring and ranking; (4) describe the robust methodology underpinning country scores and ranks; (5) highlight the GHS Index's emphasis on transparency and (6) articulate caveats for users wishing to use GHS Index data in health security research, policymaking and practice.

Original Text (This is the original text for your reference.)

The value proposition of the Global Health Security Index.

Infectious disease outbreaks pose major threats to human health and security. Countries with robust capacities for preventing, detecting and responding to outbreaks can avert many of the social, political, economic and health system costs of such crises. The Global Health Security Index (GHS Index)-the first comprehensive assessment and benchmarking of health security and related capabilities across 195 countries-recently found that no country is sufficiently prepared for epidemics or pandemics. The GHS Index can help health security stakeholders identify areas of weakness, as well as opportunities to collaborate across sectors, collectively strengthen health systems and achieve shared public health goals. Some scholars have recently offered constructive critiques of the GHS Index's approach to scoring and ranking countries; its weighting of select indicators; its emphasis on transparency; its focus on biosecurity and biosafety capacities; and divergence between select country scores and corresponding COVID-19-associated caseloads, morbidity, and mortality. Here, we (1) describe the practical value of the GHS Index; (2) present potential use cases to help policymakers and practitioners maximise the utility of the tool; (3) discuss the importance of scoring and ranking; (4) describe the robust methodology underpinning country scores and ranks; (5) highlight the GHS Index's emphasis on transparency and (6) articulate caveats for users wishing to use GHS Index data in health security research, policymaking and practice.

+More

Cite this article
APA

APA

MLA

Chicago

Ravi, Sanjana J, Bapat, Priya, Nikkari, Simo, Cameron, Elizabeth, Meyer, Diane, James, Wilmot, George, Dylan, Paterra, Michael, Bell, Jessica, Makumbi, Issa, Gozzer, Ernesto, Warmbrod, Kelsey Lane, Mullen, Lucia, Machalaba, Catherine, Nath, Indira, Tomori, Oyewale, Nuzzo, Jennifer B, Gostin, Lawrence O,.The value proposition of the Global Health Security Index.. 5 (10),.

Disclaimer: The translated content is provided by third-party translation service providers, and IKCEST shall not assume any responsibility for the accuracy and legality of the content.
Translate engine
Article's language
English
中文
Pусск
Français
Español
العربية
Português
Kikongo
Dutch
kiswahili
هَوُسَ
IsiZulu
Action
Recommended articles

Report

Select your report category*



Reason*



By pressing send, your feedback will be used to improve IKCEST. Your privacy will be protected.

Submit
Cancel