Welcome to the IKCEST

| Vol.13, Issue.3 | | Pages 16

Identifying consumer decision-making strategies using alternative methods

Abstract

Purpose - The research aims to investigate consumer decision-making strategies using quantitative and qualitative methods. Two decision theories are contrasted: neoclassical theory proposes compensatory and optimising strategies with complete information, whilst bounded rationality theory suggests simplified and non-compensatory strategies. The research assesses whether these theories will explain consumers' decision-making strategies when completing a survey, and the extent to which qualitative and quantitative methods provide convergent validity of the explanations. Design/methodology/approach - A computer-based choice survey was administered to university students and staff. The choice task was to select a preferred potato from sets of potatoes with different attributes. Information for each attribute was initially hidden by a "card"; respondents had to reveal the information by clicking on the card with the computer mouse. The survey recorded the order of mouse clicks, providing quantitative data on decision strategies. Some respondents were also interviewed about their decision processes, which provided qualitative data on strategies. Findings - Respondents left over one-fifth of the cards unopened. Interview findings confirmed that respondents generally did not obtain all available information and used simplified strategies. The qualitative data were generally validated by the quantitative data and provided improved descriptions of decision strategies. Research limitations/implications - Some qualitative data can not be verified with quantitative data, and the convenience sample of university students and staff may limit the generalisability of the findings. Originality/value - The paper suggests that consumers may not use all available information when making choices. The neoclassical assumption of full information may therefore not hold. It also indicates that probing decision strategies with qualitative questioning provides accurate data and better details than could be obtained quantitatively.

Original Text (This is the original text for your reference.)

Identifying consumer decision-making strategies using alternative methods

Purpose - The research aims to investigate consumer decision-making strategies using quantitative and qualitative methods. Two decision theories are contrasted: neoclassical theory proposes compensatory and optimising strategies with complete information, whilst bounded rationality theory suggests simplified and non-compensatory strategies. The research assesses whether these theories will explain consumers' decision-making strategies when completing a survey, and the extent to which qualitative and quantitative methods provide convergent validity of the explanations. Design/methodology/approach - A computer-based choice survey was administered to university students and staff. The choice task was to select a preferred potato from sets of potatoes with different attributes. Information for each attribute was initially hidden by a "card"; respondents had to reveal the information by clicking on the card with the computer mouse. The survey recorded the order of mouse clicks, providing quantitative data on decision strategies. Some respondents were also interviewed about their decision processes, which provided qualitative data on strategies. Findings - Respondents left over one-fifth of the cards unopened. Interview findings confirmed that respondents generally did not obtain all available information and used simplified strategies. The qualitative data were generally validated by the quantitative data and provided improved descriptions of decision strategies. Research limitations/implications - Some qualitative data can not be verified with quantitative data, and the convenience sample of university students and staff may limit the generalisability of the findings. Originality/value - The paper suggests that consumers may not use all available information when making choices. The neoclassical assumption of full information may therefore not hold. It also indicates that probing decision strategies with qualitative questioning provides accurate data and better details than could be obtained quantitatively.

+More

Cite this article
APA

APA

MLA

Chicago

.Identifying consumer decision-making strategies using alternative methods. 13 (3),16.

Disclaimer: The translated content is provided by third-party translation service providers, and IKCEST shall not assume any responsibility for the accuracy and legality of the content.
Translate engine
Article's language
English
中文
Pусск
Français
Español
العربية
Português
Kikongo
Dutch
kiswahili
هَوُسَ
IsiZulu
Action
Recommended articles

Report

Select your report category*



Reason*



By pressing send, your feedback will be used to improve IKCEST. Your privacy will be protected.

Submit
Cancel