IKCEST

R.P.C. | Vol.75, Issue.16 | | Pages 387-391

HARRY REYNOLDS V. LAFFEATY'S LD., DODWELL & COY. LD., AND S. GUITERMAN & COY. LD.

Abstract

H1Trade Mark—Infringement—“Aquamatic” and “Watermatic”—Judgment for Plaintiffs—Form of injunction.

Original Text (This is the original text for your reference.)

HARRY REYNOLDS V. LAFFEATY'S LD., DODWELL & COY. LD., AND S. GUITERMAN & COY. LD.

H1Trade Mark—Infringement—“Aquamatic” and “Watermatic”—Judgment for Plaintiffs—Form of injunction.

+More

Keywords

plaintiffsform of injunction

Cite this article

APA

MLA

Chicago

.HARRY REYNOLDS V. LAFFEATY'S LD., DODWELL & COY. LD., AND S. GUITERMAN & COY. LD.. 75 (16),387-391.

Disclaimer: The translated content is provided by third-party translation service providers, and IKCEST shall not assume any responsibility for the accuracy and legality of the content.

Translate engine

Article's language

English

中文

Pусск

Français

Español

العربية

Português

Kikongo

Dutch

kiswahili

هَوُسَ

IsiZulu

Action

Report

Collection

Report

Select your report category*

Reason*

By pressing send, your feedback will be used to improve IKCEST. Your privacy will be protected.

Submit

Cancel

Language

International

Translate engine

Article's language

Action

Recommended articles

Report