Welcome to the IKCEST

The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association | Vol.61, Issue.2 | | Pages 216-27

The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association

Fidelity in sensory integration intervention research.

L Diane, Parham Ellen S, Cohn Susan, Spitzer Jane A, Koomar Lucy Jane, Miller Janice P, Burke Barbara, Brett-Green Zoe, Mailloux Teresa A, May-Benson Susanne Smith, Roley Roseann C, Schaaf Sarah A, Schoen Clare A, Summers  
Abstract

We sought to assess validity of sensory integration outcomes research in relation to fidelity (faithfulness of intervention to underlying therapeutic principles).We identified core sensory integration intervention elements through expert review and nominal group process. Elements were classified into structural (e.g., equipment used, therapist training) and therapeutic process categories. We analyzed 34 sensory integration intervention studies for consistency of intervention descriptions with these elements.Most studies described structural elements related to therapeutic equipment and interveners' profession. Of the 10 process elements, only 1 (presentation of sensory opportunities) was addressed in all studies. Most studies described fewer than half of the process elements. Intervention descriptions in 35% of the studies were inconsistent with one process element, therapist-child collaboration.Validity of sensory integration outcomes studies is threatened by weak fidelity in regard to therapeutic process. Inferences regarding sensory integration effectiveness cannot be drawn with confidence until fidelity is adequately addressed in outcomes research.

Original Text (This is the original text for your reference.)

Fidelity in sensory integration intervention research.

We sought to assess validity of sensory integration outcomes research in relation to fidelity (faithfulness of intervention to underlying therapeutic principles).We identified core sensory integration intervention elements through expert review and nominal group process. Elements were classified into structural (e.g., equipment used, therapist training) and therapeutic process categories. We analyzed 34 sensory integration intervention studies for consistency of intervention descriptions with these elements.Most studies described structural elements related to therapeutic equipment and interveners' profession. Of the 10 process elements, only 1 (presentation of sensory opportunities) was addressed in all studies. Most studies described fewer than half of the process elements. Intervention descriptions in 35% of the studies were inconsistent with one process element, therapist-child collaboration.Validity of sensory integration outcomes studies is threatened by weak fidelity in regard to therapeutic process. Inferences regarding sensory integration effectiveness cannot be drawn with confidence until fidelity is adequately addressed in outcomes research.

+More

Cite this article
APA

APA

MLA

Chicago

L Diane, Parham Ellen S, Cohn Susan, Spitzer Jane A, Koomar Lucy Jane, Miller Janice P, Burke Barbara, Brett-Green Zoe, Mailloux Teresa A, May-Benson Susanne Smith, Roley Roseann C, Schaaf Sarah A, Schoen Clare A, Summers,.Fidelity in sensory integration intervention research.. 61 (2),216-27.

Disclaimer: The translated content is provided by third-party translation service providers, and IKCEST shall not assume any responsibility for the accuracy and legality of the content.
Translate engine
Article's language
English
中文
Pусск
Français
Español
العربية
Português
Kikongo
Dutch
kiswahili
هَوُسَ
IsiZulu
Action
Recommended articles

Report

Select your report category*



Reason*



By pressing send, your feedback will be used to improve IKCEST. Your privacy will be protected.

Submit
Cancel