Welcome to the IKCEST
WashU Expert: DACA decision lets ‘Dreamers’ breathe a little easier

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision June 18 that the Trump Administration cannot shut down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrival (DACA) program will allow more than 700,000 “Dreamers” to worry a bit less and continue focusing on their jobs, education and futures, said an immigration law expert at Washington University in St. Louis.

“However, until legislation passes through Congress to afford permanent status to Dreamers, many will continue to live in fear of being deported from the only country they know,” said Katie Herbert Meyer, director of the School of Law’s Immigration Law Clinic and assistant professor of practice.

“Today’s decision reflects a core American value of open, transparent government,” Meyer said. “The Supreme Court reaffirmed that the administration cannot take away DACA recipients’ rights and legal protections without giving a legally sufficient reason. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) cannot just declare the program, created in 2012, to be illegal without giving adequate reasons to support that conclusion. In order to justify ending the program, the administration had to give adequate, thoroughly-analyzed, policy reasons for doing so, and they failed to do that.”

Put simply, Meyer said, the court concluded that DHS did not act properly in ending the program. “Specifically, the decision to end the DACA program was ‘arbitrary and capricious’ under the Administrative Procedure Act,” she said.

DACA is more than a reprieve from the possibility of deportation, Meyer said.

“It provides recipients an opportunity for social and economic advancement that would otherwise be closed,” she said. “This advancement benefits not only them, but our society as a whole.”

According to Meyer:

  • Over 700,000 current DACA recipients may continue benefiting from DACA under this ruling.
  • Data shows that 90% of DACA recipients have a job and over half are in school.
  • A study last fall found that DACA recipients contribute $5.7 billion in federal taxes, as well as $3.1 billion in state and local.
  • A recent study out of Harvard found that DACA recipients have contributed billions of dollars to the U.S. economy.
  • Filings in the three consolidated cases before the Supreme Court revealed that over 27,000 DACA recipients work in essential health-care positions and that the U.S. is unprepared “to fill the loss that would result if DACA recipients were excluded from the healthcare workforce.”

The School of Law’s Immigration Clinic provides real-life lawyering experience representing clients in immigration proceedings.

Original Text (This is the original text for your reference.)

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision June 18 that the Trump Administration cannot shut down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrival (DACA) program will allow more than 700,000 “Dreamers” to worry a bit less and continue focusing on their jobs, education and futures, said an immigration law expert at Washington University in St. Louis.

“However, until legislation passes through Congress to afford permanent status to Dreamers, many will continue to live in fear of being deported from the only country they know,” said Katie Herbert Meyer, director of the School of Law’s Immigration Law Clinic and assistant professor of practice.

“Today’s decision reflects a core American value of open, transparent government,” Meyer said. “The Supreme Court reaffirmed that the administration cannot take away DACA recipients’ rights and legal protections without giving a legally sufficient reason. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) cannot just declare the program, created in 2012, to be illegal without giving adequate reasons to support that conclusion. In order to justify ending the program, the administration had to give adequate, thoroughly-analyzed, policy reasons for doing so, and they failed to do that.”

Put simply, Meyer said, the court concluded that DHS did not act properly in ending the program. “Specifically, the decision to end the DACA program was ‘arbitrary and capricious’ under the Administrative Procedure Act,” she said.

DACA is more than a reprieve from the possibility of deportation, Meyer said.

“It provides recipients an opportunity for social and economic advancement that would otherwise be closed,” she said. “This advancement benefits not only them, but our society as a whole.”

According to Meyer:

  • Over 700,000 current DACA recipients may continue benefiting from DACA under this ruling.
  • Data shows that 90% of DACA recipients have a job and over half are in school.
  • A study last fall found that DACA recipients contribute $5.7 billion in federal taxes, as well as $3.1 billion in state and local.
  • A recent study out of Harvard found that DACA recipients have contributed billions of dollars to the U.S. economy.
  • Filings in the three consolidated cases before the Supreme Court revealed that over 27,000 DACA recipients work in essential health-care positions and that the U.S. is unprepared “to fill the loss that would result if DACA recipients were excluded from the healthcare workforce.”

The School of Law’s Immigration Clinic provides real-life lawyering experience representing clients in immigration proceedings.

Comments

    Something to say?

    Log in or Sign up for free

    Disclaimer: The translated content is provided by third-party translation service providers, and IKCEST shall not assume any responsibility for the accuracy and legality of the content.
    Translate engine
    Article's language
    English
    中文
    Pусск
    Français
    Español
    العربية
    Português
    Kikongo
    Dutch
    kiswahili
    هَوُسَ
    IsiZulu
    Action
    Related

    Report

    Select your report category*



    Reason*



    By pressing send, your feedback will be used to improve IKCEST. Your privacy will be protected.

    Submit
    Cancel