Welcome to the IKCEST
More than 60% of Farmers Still Have Dicamba to Apply
sonja.jpg
Farmers answered with how many acres of (applicable) soybeans still need to be applied with dicamba.
( Farm Journal Pulse )

With recent Court rulings, three of the four legal over-the-top dicamba applications are cancelled. With the cancellation, farmers were told they could use existing stocks in their possession by June 3, 2020—but how many farmers had stocks on hand or have had the ability to spray the product according to the label?

In a recent Farm Journal Pulse, with 539 responses, 36% of farmers said they were done with dicamba applications for the season. With 64% of respondents saying they still have acres to spray, here’s the breakdown:

  • 50% to 100% left: 33%
  • 25% to 50% left: 14%
  • Under 25% left: 18%

Farmers await the Court’s next decision as plaintiffs are petitioning for immediate vacatur of the three pesticides. They claim EPA should be held in contempt, as well.

“This seems like it’s illegal because EPA is defying the court order and the court had every intention when they passed that rule that, that was it, no more use of this chemical because it wasn’t approved,” says Jim Goodman, with the National Family Farm Coalition, plaintiff in the lawsuit that lead to dicamba’s vacatur. “EPA seems to feel that they have more authority than state and local governments, even the court system.”

EPA, however, is encouraging the court to uphold their cancellation order and provisions for existing stock. If the Court does this, farmers would still be able to apply existing dicamba stocks until July 31 or state-specific cutoffs.

“Petitioners’ motion to ‘Enforce this Court’s Vacatur and to Hold EPA in Contempt,’ is a thinly-veiled attempt to revive arguments the court already rejected or declined to reach. It should be denied,” EPA said in court documents.

Read more about recent lawsuits:

EPA Says Motion In Dicamba Case Is “Distorted Characterization”

Will Farmers Be Able to Spray Dicamba Next Week?

Dicamba’s Future is Shaky—Is Enlist Next on the Chopping Block?

BREAKING: Court Removes Three Out of Four Dicamba Registrations 

Non-Dicamba Options for Dicamba-Tolerant Soybeans

 

Original Text (This is the original text for your reference.)

sonja.jpg
Farmers answered with how many acres of (applicable) soybeans still need to be applied with dicamba.
( Farm Journal Pulse )

With recent Court rulings, three of the four legal over-the-top dicamba applications are cancelled. With the cancellation, farmers were told they could use existing stocks in their possession by June 3, 2020—but how many farmers had stocks on hand or have had the ability to spray the product according to the label?

In a recent Farm Journal Pulse, with 539 responses, 36% of farmers said they were done with dicamba applications for the season. With 64% of respondents saying they still have acres to spray, here’s the breakdown:

  • 50% to 100% left: 33%
  • 25% to 50% left: 14%
  • Under 25% left: 18%

Farmers await the Court’s next decision as plaintiffs are petitioning for immediate vacatur of the three pesticides. They claim EPA should be held in contempt, as well.

“This seems like it’s illegal because EPA is defying the court order and the court had every intention when they passed that rule that, that was it, no more use of this chemical because it wasn’t approved,” says Jim Goodman, with the National Family Farm Coalition, plaintiff in the lawsuit that lead to dicamba’s vacatur. “EPA seems to feel that they have more authority than state and local governments, even the court system.”

EPA, however, is encouraging the court to uphold their cancellation order and provisions for existing stock. If the Court does this, farmers would still be able to apply existing dicamba stocks until July 31 or state-specific cutoffs.

“Petitioners’ motion to ‘Enforce this Court’s Vacatur and to Hold EPA in Contempt,’ is a thinly-veiled attempt to revive arguments the court already rejected or declined to reach. It should be denied,” EPA said in court documents.

Read more about recent lawsuits:

EPA Says Motion In Dicamba Case Is “Distorted Characterization”

Will Farmers Be Able to Spray Dicamba Next Week?

Dicamba’s Future is Shaky—Is Enlist Next on the Chopping Block?

BREAKING: Court Removes Three Out of Four Dicamba Registrations 

Non-Dicamba Options for Dicamba-Tolerant Soybeans

 

Comments

    Something to say?

    Log in or Sign up for free

    Disclaimer: The translated content is provided by third-party translation service providers, and IKCEST shall not assume any responsibility for the accuracy and legality of the content.
    Translate engine
    Article's language
    English
    中文
    Pусск
    Français
    Español
    العربية
    Português
    Kikongo
    Dutch
    kiswahili
    هَوُسَ
    IsiZulu
    Action
    Related

    Report

    Select your report category*



    Reason*



    By pressing send, your feedback will be used to improve IKCEST. Your privacy will be protected.

    Submit
    Cancel